Left 4 Dead – Left 2 Die? (Updated)

A lot of people are happy that a sequel to Left 4 Dead has been announced, a lot of people are upset or even angry however and I really can’t blame them.

The people saying they deserve free content are of course wrong, Valve owe them nothing of the sort. I do however believe that some of them do have a point. They paid anywhere between £20 and £35 (depending on where they got it and when) for Left 4 Dead and have now been told that it was the price for one years play. “But you can continue to play Left 4 Dead after the sequel comes out” I hear you say, not entirely true. Look at what happened when Epic released a direct (and improved) replacement for Unreal Tournament 2003 one year later, everyone moved to Unreal Tournament 2004, and servers for 2003 became empty and lonely places. A sequel with this few changes, mainly things that were promised in the release of the original, will move most of the playerbase away from the original game, leaving only the bots to play with. Some people are saying “Valve will continue to support the first game”, but that really doesn’t mater if there is no one playing it any more. Perhaps Valve intend to turn it into a yearly franchise? Well there is a reason why I don’t buy multiplayer games published by Activision, they don’t bloody last. Everyone moves on to the inevitable sequel and your game becomes worthless. If I wanted to pay a subscription for my on-line gaming then I would buy a bloody XBox, I don’t need the latest mindless sequel to have fun in an on-line game, I just need other players to still be on it. I know multiplayer games have a limited lifespan, (you can’t find many servers for Death Match Classic any more, UT2004 is almost unplayable on-line) but to limit it to one year like this is frigging ridiculous.

In my opinion Valve should release this as an expansion pack. They should port the new AI and director to the first one (for free) and then allow them to play against owners of expansion pack (and original) on the old campaigns only. Doing it as an expansion pack like this is the only way they will not kill the player base of the first game. If they do release a strait sequel you can bet that a lot of people won’t buy it for fear of Left 4 Dead 3 the following autumn.

Part of me hopes that this announcement is a joke, and there are a few oddities that point to that being the case. I don’t mind paying for an update like this and I don’t think I have been ripped off with the content I have got for my initial purchase, but to make a sequel of a multiplayer game so soon, before the first has really had a chance to build up a proper community, will kill off the old game within a week or so of the sequels release.

It will be interesting to see how long Left 4 Dead stays at the top of the Steam best-sellers list now it has clearly been Left 2 Die.

Valve’s Erik Johnson has made a statement regarding the community upset over L4D2.

We do have risks in that we don’t want to split the two camps, we don’t want a Left 4 Dead 1 group and a Left 4 Dead 2 group, that’s a problem that we need to figure out.

If they do work out how to do it (and in my opinion the only way is to release this as an expansion that requires the original) then I will take back what I have said. Until then however I remain disappointed with the news that they thought that L4D was so bad that they needed to start on a sequel right away. If they were that unhappy with it why did they charge £35 for it?

Their splitting of the official forums hasn’t helped either.



2 Responses to “Left 4 Dead – Left 2 Die? (Updated)”

  1. June 3, 2009 at 20:17

    I’ve not really got much feeling about this issue, probably because I’ve played Left 4 Dead and while I enjoyed it I’m not in a rush to try any more. (although I’ll be happy to take it. :P) I shalln’t be buying L4D2 unless something really new and different comes along.

    I do like your idea though, for a sequel\expansion combo. Thinking about it, it’s strange there aren’t any examples (that I can think of) of this because it would be a great way for devs to migrate players from one version to the next.

  2. 2 AJ
    June 7, 2009 at 18:39

    This is an interesting issue for me. I did at first not like the idea but having read the PCG preview this weekend I am sort of warming to the idea of the sequel and also the reasons behind why they chose to do Left 4 Dead 2 as a sequel than updates. For a start the AI Director 2 sounds incredible and the whole game sounds more structured and more evolved than Left 4 Dead. As someone did say it seems like Left 4 Dead was more of a prototype than a full release.

    It remains to be seen as to what will happen with the first game but I do suspect it will die a rather unfortunate death, I am not sure even with the SDK platform being released people will want to play the first game when a second and better game will be out as you said.

    I hope in some ways this will be the only time Valve do this. It really is rather annoying but luckily they seem to have reduced Left 4 Dead’s price to £26.99. Not sure what it was before though. Would be nice of them to lower it a bit more now though prolong the life of the game (who can resist a good bargain afterall?).

    Just to let you know Jon I think on Activisions behalf I shall defend them in the way that Modern Warfare seems to still be going strong on the multiplayer front and still selling 1.5 years on from its initial release. Not bad considering COD 5 came out last year.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s


Top Clicks

  • None


I can take no responsibility for the content of any external links in this blog, usual internet security practices should apply when using them or downloading content from external sites. ......................................................